Picking up where
the last post left off, we’re about to find out what the response is from the
nearer-kinsman concerning the redemption of Naomi’s field, and Gentile Ruth.
Boaz has promised to provide a covering for Ruth, speaking figuratively, but he
needs to make sure nobody else is going to claim her for His own.
6 Then Bo'az said,
"The day you buy the field from the hand of Na'omi, you are also buying
Ruth the Moabitess, the widow of the dead, in order to restore the name of the dead
to his inheritance." Then the next of kin said, "I cannot redeem it
for myself, lest I impair my own inheritance. Take my right of redemption
yourself, for I cannot redeem it."
What’s the inheritance this unnamed* nearer-kinsman
is speaking about in verse six? Let’s continue with the idea that Boaz represents Jesus,
and the unnamed nearer-kinsman is God. Would God say that he can’t redeem the
Gentiles (through marriage) because it would impair his relationship to Israel?
I think so. A redeemer can’t
have more than one bride, and if he takes the Gentile bride, Ruth, to Himself
that leaves Israel out in the cold. And God would NEVER do that.
In keeping with the theme of marriage
that’s woven through the Old and New Testament, Israel was divorced by God as
plainly stated in the book of Jeremiah:
Jeremiah 3:8 She
saw that for all the adulteries of that faithless one, Israel, I had sent her
away with a decree of divorce; yet her false sister Judah did not fear, but she
too went and played the harlot. 9 Because harlotry was so light to her, she
polluted the land, committing adultery with stone and tree. 10 Yet for all this
her false sister Judah did not return to me with her whole heart, but in
pretense, says the LORD." 11 And the LORD said to me, "Faithless
Israel has shown herself less guilty than false Judah. 12 Go, and proclaim
these words toward the north, and say, 'Return, faithless Israel, says the
LORD. I will not look on you in anger, for I am merciful, says the LORD; I will
not be angry for ever.
God divorced
Israel, so the only way they can be redeemed is by God. If Jesus is represented
by Boaz, then Boaz had to redeem Gentile Ruth. God couldn’t take on Ruth as his
bride, because it would prevent him from reconciling with Israel. It would
impair his own inheritance. Pastor Sandy Armstrong of Soldiers for Christ inLong Beach, CA has preached this very same message, which I’m reminded of as I
write this post. If you haven’t listened to Pastor Sandy, you really ought to.
His insights are remarkable.
This is the
divvying up of the redeemed ones: Israel and the Church. The unredeemed,
represented by Orpah, are completely left out of any marriage. If there are
unredeemed of the gentiles, then there are probably unredeemed in Israel. I
don’t know this for certain, but I think there’s a clue in chapter four:
Ruth 4:2: And he
took ten men of the elders of the city, and said, “Sit down here”; so they sat
down.
There were ten
elders, instead of the normal twelve that would represent each of the twelve
tribes. Regardless of who was witnessing, the agreement was struck between the two
kinsmen about who is going to redeem whom. It was time to seal the deal.
Ruth 4:7 Now this
was the custom in former times in Israel concerning redeeming and exchanging:
to confirm a transaction, the one drew off his sandal and gave it to the other,
and this was the manner of attesting in Israel. 8 So when the next of kin said
to Bo'az, "Buy it for yourself," he drew off his sandal.
There are a couple
of other times a sandal removal indicated a redemption or exchange in scripture. Each time, something truly
significant is happening. One of them was when Moses is called by God to lead Israel out of
bondage:
Exodus 3:5 Then He said, "Do not come near here; remove your sandals
from your feet, for the place on which you are standing is holy ground."
Moses is asked to make an agreement to be
redeemed by God as a leader of Israel. Scripture does not clearly state that
Moses took of his shoes. Rather, he hid his face. Remember, he wasn’t allowed
to cross the Jordan.
Joshua 5:15 The captain of the LORD'S host said to Joshua, "Remove
your sandals from your feet, for the place where you are standing is
holy." And Joshua did so.
The second time, Joshua has accepted leadership of the people he brought into
the Promised Land by crossing the Jordan. Joshua complied immediately. And that
exactly the odd little bit of scripture that brought my attention to the
symbolism of Joshua, which I also wrote about in the spring of 2018. Back to
the story of Ruth…
Boaz also removed his sandal. So, now that the deal is
sealed between Boaz and the unnamed kinsman, all the witnesses make a very bold declaration Boaz:
Ruth 4:11 Then all
the people who were at the gate, and the elders, said, "We are witnesses.
May the LORD make the woman, who is coming into your house, like Rachel and
Leah, who together built up the house of Israel. May you prosper in Eph'rathah
and be renowned in Bethlehem; 12 and may your house be like the house of Perez,
whom Tamar bore to Judah, because of the children that the LORD will give you
by this young woman."
The actual
translation of “May you prosper in Ephrathah…” as listed at Blue Letter Bible, is “May you achieve wealth in
Ephrathah...” That said, the word that is being translated to wealth is ×—×™ִל (khah'-yil) from H2342; which more typically is used to mean a
force of men, means or other resources; an army. According to Abarim-publications.com,
the name Ephrathah probably comes from the root-verb פרה (para), meaning to be fruitful or to
bear fruit. But, para has similarities with the roots פרץ (paras), meaning to break (through),
פרש (paras
and parash), meaning to spread out or declare, and פרס (paras),
meaning to break in two or divide. In fact the website further explains
that the root-verb פרר (parar) generally reflects the
undoing of a previously established agreement. Almost half of the more than
fifty occurrences of our verb conveys the "breaking" of a covenant.
This
little phrase about prospering in Ephrathah might really mean, “May what comes
of the union between you and your gentile bride result in a force that breaks a
covenant.”
Isa 28:18 Then your covenant with death will be annulled, and your agreement with Sheol will not stand; when the overwhelming scourge passes through you will be beaten down by it.
Looking at the
rest of verses 4:11-12, Boaz’s is offered the blessing of Ruth becoming like Rachel
and Leah, who birthed the tribes of Israel. He is also offered the blessing to
become like the house of Perez. Not only is Perez obviously the blood line of
David (therefore Jesus), but is also a tribe that kept its unique identity for a long time. The sub-tribe begins at another remarkable birthing point where the older twin son is
usurped by the younger. If we look at the letters that the name Perez is
comprised of, they are Pey, Resh, and Ayin. The meanings of these letters are:
Eternal Life, Sufficiency of God/Insufficiency of Man, and Nations. These sound
like great blessings to have. Then the passage gets even more interesting.
Ruth 4:13 So Bo'az
took Ruth and she became his wife; and he went in to her, and the LORD gave her
conception, and she bore a son. 14 Then the women said to Na'omi, "Blessed
be the LORD, who has not left you this day without next of kin; and may his
name be renowned in Israel! 15 He shall be to you a restorer of life and a
nourisher of your old age; for your daughter-in-law who loves you, who is more
to you than seven sons, has borne him."
Ruth gives birth
to a son named Obed. Obed means “Servant.” The servant she bore is to become
famous in Israel, and Ruth becomes a blessing worth more than seven sons to
Naomi. That says a lot. Note the instance of the number seven, as
in the number of spiritual perfection, the seven lamps, and the seven churches.
Ruth 4:16 Then Na'omi
took the child and laid him in her bosom, and became his nurse. 17 And the
women of the neighborhood gave him a name, saying, "A son has been born to
Na'omi." They named him Obed; he was the father of Jesse, the father of
David.
The father of
Jesse, who is the father of David, the line of Jesus was born in verse 17,
which is the number of victory. Take a moment and offer some praise to God – I’ll
wait. He really is amazing.
If you have read my blog at
other times, you’ll know that I am fascinated by the translations that come out
of a series of names given in scripture. This is especially true if the list of
names is touted as a genealogy. I believe these genealogies are given as
portions of the larger story of the redemption of mankind, and this list of ten
(a great work!) names is no exception:
Ruth 4:18 Now
these are the descendants of Perez: Perez was the father of Hezron, 19 Hezron
of Ram, Ram of Ammin'adab, 20 Ammin'adab of Nahshon, Nahshon of Salmon, 21 Salmon
of Bo'az, Bo'az of Obed, 22 Obed of Jesse, and Jesse of David.
Perez | Breach |
Hezron | Enclosure/ Surrounded by a Wall |
Ram | High, Exalted |
Amminidab | People of Liberality |
Nashon | Enchanter/Serpent |
Salmon | Garment |
Boaz | Strength / In Him is Strength |
Obed | Servant |
Jesse | My Husband |
David | Beloved/Bringing Love |
Let me break it up according to verse, to make it
easier to see:
A Breach (in the) Enclosure
The Enclosure (that’s) High (of the) Exalted
People of Liberality
The People of Liberality, (the) Enchanters, the Serpent
Garment
Here’s where the mighty work is completed by Naomi
going to Moab and returning with a willing family member in Ruth. A new story line
begins, and poetically starts out with a new garment.
The Garment (of) Strength, In Him is Strength,
(the) Servant
(The) Servant, My Husband. My Husband Bringing Love.
Recall that I said out feelings about a broken covenant depend largely upon what that covenant is. The same is true about a wall, isn’t it? I wish more people would take that to heart as they argue with each other about whether the border wall is evil.
Walls are, in simple terms, just enclosures. They’re just as capable for keeping people in, as they are of keeping people out. While Adam and Eve were inside the garden with God, enclosure looked pretty good. While they were on the outside of it, it was awful.
Whether a wall is good or evil is wholly dependent upon the intentions for its purpose. And the southern border wall isn't nearly as life-changing as the one that has been in existence since the Garden of Eden. We've had a wall to fight over throughout the entire history of humanity.
Perhaps you already know this, but many people mistakenly believe the famous Berlin wall was to keep West Germany out, but it was really erected to prevent East Germans from fleeing conditions of oppression to the more attractive West. The wall was built to prevent escape to freedom.
The wall created between us and God by Sin is the same thing. You may think that God’s commandments are standing in the way of your freedom, but they’re actually standing in the way of your imprisonment.
The wall created by a sinful life, has been breached by Jesus Christ, if we only do as Ruth did, and give that life up to willingly accept redemption through Christ, the Lamb of God.
And THAT, my readers, is what I see in the Book of Ruth.
Be a Ruth. Recognize your kinship with Israel and show your willingness to be redeemed through Jesus. Follow him willingly and labor diligently in the harvest of his field. Let him break your covenant with death and set you free – breaching the wall of your imprisonment. Commit as if it were a matter of life and death. Because it really is.
Keep looking up!
*This is a great time to draw the connection between Boaz, who will redeem Ruth, and the pillars at Solomon's temple. Boaz, we can clearly understand. Jachin, the other pillar, means "God Will Establish."
Amen! Love the geneology phrasology - so fascinating! And the wall. wow !
ReplyDeletethis gave me even a more deeper picture of how Great the Love of the Father is and how He keeps His promises and provides in such detailed ways-- how can i ever doubt His provision for me?? Amazing Love!
ReplyDeleteAWESOME ! Thanks for sharing this.
ReplyDelete